Korean J healthc assoc Infect Control Prev 2009; 14(2): 79-87
Published online December 31, 2009 https://doi.org/10.14192/kjicp.2009.14.2.79
Copyright © Korean Society for Healthcare-associated infection Control and Prevention
Hye Jin Park1, Jae Sim Jeong1, Sang Ho Choi2, and Jun Hee Woo2,3
Department of Clinical Nursing, University of Ulsan1, Department of Infectious Diseases2 and Infection Control Office3, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Background: This study purposed to survey the fit rate of respirators by person and by product through conducting a qualitative fit test of high-efficiency respirators; moreover, this study also tests for differences in the fit rates determined by the qualitative fit tests with an increase in the number of the types of respirators tested.
Methods: The subjects of this study were 30 healthcare personnel who had passed a sensitivity test. The fit test of high-efficiency respirators was conducted using FT10 (3M Co., USA), an experimental tool used for performing the qualitative fit test of high-efficiency respirators, and three types of high-efficiency respirators - 1860, PFR95, and N7000 - were tested.
Results: The qualitative fit test was performed for the three types of high-efficiency respirators and the fit rate of the respirators that the subjects had been using previously was 43.3%; however, the probability that one or more of the three types of high-efficiency respirators would fit the subjects increased to 83.3%, and this increase was statistically significant (P＜0.05). The difference in the fit rates of the three types of high-efficiency respirator types was not statistically significant; however, the differences in the satisfaction of and preference for the different respirator products were all statistically significant (P＜0.05).
Conclusion: Healthcare personnel are using ill-fitting respirators and a qualitative fit test should be performed to improve the fit of their respirator. In the qualitative fit test performed for the high-efficiency respirators, the fit rate increased with the increase in the variety of respirator types. Thus, a large variety of respirators should be made available to increase the fit rate of high-efficiency respirators for healthcare personnel.
Keywords: Respiratory protective device, Qualitative fit test, Healthcare personnel
Song Yi An, Woong Jung, Chang Min Lee, Sung Hyuk Park, Hyun Kyung Park, Myung Chun...2009; 14(2): 66-71