닫기

대한의료관련감염관리학회

View

Review Article

Korean J healthc assoc Infect Control Prev 2024; 29(1): 19-26

Published online June 30, 2024 https://doi.org/10.14192/kjicp.2024.29.1.19

Copyright © Korean Society for Healthcare-associated infection Control and Prevention

Chechk for updates

Laboratory Diagnosis and Interpretation of Urinary Tract Infections

Young Jin Kim1, Min-Chul Cho2

Department of Laboratory Medicine, Kyung Hee University Hospital, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine1, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Korea University Guro Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine2, Seoul, Korea

Correspondence to: Min-Chul Cho
E-mail: minchulcho7397@gmail.com
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0609-7734

Received: April 25, 2024; Revised: May 7, 2024; Accepted: May 8, 2024

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0).

Abstract

Urinary tract infection (UTI) is a common and costly disease that affects millions of people worldwide each year. Accurate laboratory diagnosis of UTI is crucial to reduce antimicrobial resistance in UTI pathogens because of unnecessary antimicrobial use. Routine urinalysis with urine dipstick analysis and Gram staining can be used to screen for UTI. The conventional ‘gold standard’ for diagnosing UTIs involves culture-based tests. This method entails culturing the urine sample to amplify the bacteria to detectable levels, followed by biochemical and serological tests, as well as antimicrobial susceptibility tests. However, culture-based tests have the disadvantage of requiring 48-72 hours to report results owing to the time needed for bacterial growth. Therefore, various methods have been developed and are used to diagnose UTI to replace time-consuming culture tests. These methods include flow cytometry, mass spectrometry, and nucleic-acid-based diagnostic tests. This review introduces various laboratory methods used to diagnose UTI in clinical microbiology laboratories and discusses their principles and interpretation methods.

Keywords: Urinary tract infection, Laboratory diagnosis, Urine culture, Flow cytometry, Molecular diagnostics

Share this article on :

Related articles in KJICP

더보기

Laboratory Diagnosis of Carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales

Song Yi An, Woong Jung, Chang Min Lee, Sung Hyuk Park, Hyun Kyung Park, Myung Chun...

2023; 28(1): 42-49 https://doi.org/10.14192/kjicp.2023.28.1.42

Microorganisms Isolated from Urine Cultures and Their Antimicrobial Susceptibility Patterns at a Commercial Laboratory during 2018-2020

Song Yi An, Woong Jung, Chang Min Lee, Sung Hyuk Park, Hyun Kyung Park, Myung Chun...

2022; 27(1): 51-58 https://doi.org/10.14192/kjicp.2022.27.1.51

Use of Non-carbapenem Antibiotics in Patients with Urinary Tract Infection Caused by Extended-spectrum Beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae

Song Yi An, Woong Jung, Chang Min Lee, Sung Hyuk Park, Hyun Kyung Park, Myung Chun...

2016; 21(2): 50-56 https://doi.org/10.14192/kjicp.2016.21.2.50

Most KeyWord