Korean J healthc assoc Infect Control Prev 2018; 23(1): 14-23
Published online June 30, 2018 https://doi.org/10.14192/kjhaicp.2018.23.1.14
Copyright © Korean Society for Healthcare-associated infection Control and Prevention
Jeonghyun Chang1, Taegeun Lee1, Heungsup Sung1, Mi-Na Kim1, Youn-Jung Kim2, Yoon-Seon Lee2
Departments of Laboratory Medicine1 and Emergency Medicine2, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Background: A safety device is recommended to improve the safety and performance of blood culture practice. BD vacutainerⓇ Safety-LokTM blood collection sets with pre-attached holder (Safety-Lok) were evaluated in the emergency room (ER) of a tertiary care hospital. Methods: Interns and nurses in the ER were surveyed regarding blood culture practices with a questionnaire before and after 2 or 3 weeks of experience with using Safety-Lok from April to June 2017. All participants underwent a 1-h exercise workshop combined with video education before the initial survey. The blood volume, positivity, and contamination rates of Safety-Lok-drawn (SD) blood cultures were compared to those of the overall blood cultures. Results: A total of 18 interns and 30 nurses were enrolled. The result of the initial survey showed that interns had higher rates of needle stick incidence (27.8%), higher rates of carriage of blood-filled syringe with needle (88.9%), and lower rates of VacutainerⓇ one-use holder (BD, USA) use (38.9%) than nurses had (13.3%, 53.3%, and 60.0%, respectively). Compared with nurses (40.0%), interns preferred to use safety devices (88.9%). The number of overall blood cultures and SD blood cultures were 9,053 and 555, respectively, during the study period. The overall blood volume collected in aerobic bottles was 2.6±2.1 mL, and the SD blood volumes collected in aerobic and anaerobic bottles were 5.0±3.0 mL and 6.0±3.0 mL, respectively. Positive and contamination rates were 6.5% and 0.72% with SD blood cultures and 6.2% and 0.3% with overall blood cultures, respectively. Conclusion: The introduction of the safety device would encourage healthcare workers to collect adequate blood volume and would lead to safer practices in the ER.
Keywords: Blood culture, Needlestick, Safety device, Volume
Song Yi An, Woong Jung, Chang Min Lee, Sung Hyuk Park, Hyun Kyung Park, Myung Chun...2010; 15(1): 41-47